From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f7230830b229a11 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-30 11:28:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FW: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada? Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PVV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1064946515 26383 129.241.83.78 (30 Sep 2003 18:28:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:28:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30 Date: 2003-09-30T18:28:35+00:00 List-Id: On 2003-09-30, M�rio Amado Alves wrote: >> I thought we were talking about a function that /returned/ a >> String or Unbounded_String. Of course one can use >> To_Bounded_String, but then what's the point of the >> Unbounded_String function? > > No point. That was my point. Only String versions is enough. And some thing an array of integers are enough. I thought the point of returning Unbounded_String was to make the Strings a bit easier to handle. Preben