From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 04:39:16 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada? [although this thread changed
 to something else a long time ago]
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PVV
Message-ID: <slrnbn5kv1.e9.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <u1xuja5zs.fsf@earthlink.net>
 <bebbba07.0309141159.37274fb3@posting.google.com>
 <3F650BBE.4080107@attbi.com>
 <bebbba07.0309142311.5e985121@posting.google.com>
 <KdadnYb-q-ujZviiU-KYgw@gbronline.com> <3F67AAC6.2000906@attbi.com>
 <RbSdnT6kv7SrdPqiU-KYuQ@gbronline.com>
 <bebbba07.0309171110.192b565c@posting.google.com> <3F7024F8.1000102@crs4.it>
 <bebbba07.0309231059.130bddd1@posting.google.com> <3F71A78A.5000701@crs4.it>
 <bebbba07.0309241642.6c1146f0@posting.google.com>
 <bkubhj$5v7t7$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <BkAcb.579943$uu5.94364@sccrnsc04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1064489955 17414 129.241.83.78 (25 Sep 2003
 11:39:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42888
Date: 2003-09-25T11:39:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2003-09-25, Jeff C, <nolongersafeto@userealemailsniff.com> wrote:
> Yipes! I think you just made the point that the C++ syntax is less error
> prone...Now this mis-named thread will  never die.

No he didn't. The Ada way is less error prone and that is what is
resticting Ada from having the second form. See earlier discussion about
exceptions etc... on this += discussion.

Preben