From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bfc24df595f18c1d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-17 04:13:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interfaces and Generics? Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <3F67A207.7060007@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1063797229 20911 217.17.192.37 (17 Sep 2003 11:13:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42613 Date: 2003-09-17T11:13:49+00:00 List-Id: * Robert I. Eachus wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you would like to be able to say: > > generic > type Foo is new A with B, C; > package Bar is... > > If so, it is a very good question. I don't think it is currently part > of the proposal. I am also not sure how useful it would be, but it > would certainly be a good idea for orthogonality reasons. What about 'type Foo is new A, B, C with private;'?