From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,452860c2cffef8e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-26 02:32:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Virus Resistive Software Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3F4A55D7.2060404@spam.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1061890352 17872 129.241.83.78 (26 Aug 2003 09:32:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:32:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41861 Date: 2003-08-26T09:32:32+00:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter wrote: > Outlook is probably the most vulnerable mail program out there; at > least when I had to use it, by default it installed with most of its > protections turned off, and most of its most vulnerable features > turned on. And the reason is that it is much more userfriendly if the viruses can install themselves so the user isn't burden to do it manually. -- �I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet. So who am I to judge.� - The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy (radioplay)