From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,757d3d6a4830d6a4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-17 13:08:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news.uni-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Adrian Knoth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Idea of a new Ada website. Date: 17 Aug 2003 20:08:09 GMT Organization: loris.TV Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de X-Trace: fsuj29.rz.uni-jena.de 1061150889 23331 141.35.13.101 (17 Aug 2003 20:08:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@rz.uni-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2003 20:08:09 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41657 Date: 2003-08-17T20:08:09+00:00 List-Id: Stephane Richard wrote: > Why smarter? it's the only part of the message I wanted detauls on. adn > below was the whole email.. First a usenet-posting is not a email. Second, am I interested to read the answer above the question? No, so write below. Last, the whole message is not necessary if you only refer to some lines of it. And last+1th point (constraint error, I know): you don't have to put the original message-ID twice in one posting. Just have a look at my beginning, it reads like: "Stephane Richard wrote:" Your introduction is "in news:msgid\n something else". It's is absolutely unimportant to state the msgid, because it is included in the reference-header. And two lines of introduction is almost like a whole chapter, not a introduction-line. -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Das wenige was ich esse kann ich auch trinken!