From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2cd66a22cddc54c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-15 01:16:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: FLTK and Ada? Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <20030814152258.5048361c.david@realityrift.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1060935379 24364 129.241.83.78 (15 Aug 2003 08:16:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:16:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41479 Date: 2003-08-15T08:16:19+00:00 List-Id: Chad R. Meiners wrote: > Sure, why not. I have seen a lot of embedded systems with screens that let > you control what the hardware is doing. Of course most embedded systems Sure but most of these systems hopefully have the GUI built into the system and not adding them as extra libraries. Say you have three apps to run on a cell-phone you wouldn't program one with GtkAda, one with QT and the last with FLTK f.ex. You would most likely use the underlying OS. I remember in the old days the Amiga had a large ROM which contained much of what was needed and you didn't need a lot of huge libraries on disk. -- �I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet. So who am I to judge.� - The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy (radioplay)