From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9629eba26884d78
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-31 04:27:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: XML DOM Binding for Ada 95 - matter of style
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnbihv85.4jd.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <bg8ac5$20i3$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de>
 <3f27bab4$1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> <bg8noh$22ti$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de>
 <uk7a0gejp.fsf@nasa.gov> <3F28F61D.4050504@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1059650852 27406 129.241.83.78 (31 Jul 2003
 11:27:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41071
Date: 2003-07-31T11:27:32+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marin David Condic wrote:
> BTW: I never really liked the XMLAda approach of using discriminated 
> records and thought it should have been built in a more Object Oriented 
> way using tagged records.

What is the gain?

I thought one of the problems with Booch was that it was using tagged
types too much. Does Charles also use this approach?

-- 
Ada95 is good for you.
http://www.crystalcode.com/codemage/MainMenu/Coding/Ada/IntroducingAda.php