From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf7bb651bfb9d65c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-29 05:51:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Ada.Numerics.Aux question Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1059483081 16075 129.241.83.78 (29 Jul 2003 12:51:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40941 Date: 2003-07-29T12:51:21+00:00 List-Id: Happy Segfault wrote: > Bad news is that it's confirmed in 3.3. Use Gnat 3.15p instead. I guess gcc 3.x will be stable around gcc 4.0 -- Ada95 is good for you. http://www.crystalcode.com/codemage/MainMenu/Coding/Ada/IntroducingAda.php