From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b2046241520981f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-28 01:40:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 0x, exception idea ? Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3F229597.3090909@myob.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1059381495 2662 129.241.83.78 (28 Jul 2003 08:38:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:38:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40895 Date: 2003-07-28T08:38:15+00:00 List-Id: sk wrote: > randhol+abuse@pvv.org: > > Yes, Why? Why is writing source code in one line so important? > ... > I find a large nested error checking "if-then-elsif" distracting > from keeping a focus on the overall algorithm I find that hard to believe. Why would you need a large nested error checking? And how would you manage to get away from the nesting with the raise ... when ? -- Ada95 is good for you. http://www.crystalcode.com/codemage/MainMenu/Coding/Ada/IntroducingAda.php