From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6f7b92fd11ab291 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-16 23:46:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Crosspost: Help wanted from comp.compilers Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <1058275843.720814@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F158832.1040206@attbi.com> <1058378673.35463@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1058390613.119827@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1058424409 25358 217.17.192.37 (17 Jul 2003 06:46:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:46:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40387 Date: 2003-07-17T06:46:49+00:00 List-Id: * Hyman Rosen wrote: > John R. Strohm wrote: >> The same thing can occur in Ada. An overt change in one specification may >> propagate through a chain of apparently-unchanged descendants, producing >> hidden but very real semantic changes in each of them, and eventually >> producing a very visible change in the final descendant. > > You're not listening. The complaint was that some Ada systems recompiled > dependents when a file was compiled, even if the source code had not > changed. You keep telling me that changes can ncessitate recompilation. > I know that. Ada knows that. Ada specifies such dependencies on changes > very carefully. Yep. I prefer checksums over files to determine recompiling issues. Especially using the Spark tools urged this method to come to an end before the day is over.