From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2f0af5e440b367f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-26 10:58:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: proposal for new assignment operators Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1056650305 16528 129.241.83.78 (26 Jun 2003 17:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:58:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39779 Date: 2003-06-26T17:58:25+00:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Preben Randhol wrote: >: >: I don't believe this is from a *working* program. > > o.K. ["Pornographic" ;-) code removed] Ok, then: I don't believe this is from a *work* program ;-) Well what it proved is that one actually can write: :=+ in Ada although it might not give the result some here would like :-) Preben -- "... in Ada, you can never have a buffer overflow error. Unless of course you go very far out of your way to specifically program one [...] most Ada programmers would consider going out of your way to construct an Ada program that had a potential buffer overflow not as a challenge, but as a kind of pornography." - Robert I. Eachus