From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d2df3e9ad18fa63
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-25 02:46:18 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail
From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ISO/IEC 14519 - Ada POSIX binding
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:46:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
Message-ID: <slrnbfirr8.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
References: <m38yrxd9pf.fsf@niflheim.malonet> <3EF2F6B8.3030706@noplace.com>
 <rw28yrwc04e.fsf@lbrenta.corp.emc.com> <3EF338C5.2010005@cogeco.ca>
 <sxydnZ6o9r-I7m6jXTWJhg@gbronline.com> <wQOIa.4781$ZE.2242@lakeread05>
 <87r85nqlwa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <un4Ja.7658$ZE.5855@lakeread05>
 <3EF7273A.8060704@cogeco.ca> <uwufc76xk.fsf@xsol.com>
 <slrnbfg7r3.nq.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> <ubrwn5hr7.fsf@xsol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1056534377 933 217.17.192.37 (25 Jun 2003
 09:46:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:46:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39711
Date: 2003-06-25T09:46:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Berend de Boer wrote:
>>>>>> "Lutz" == Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de> writes:
>> No.  work/ada/src/kernel/kernel-linux_i86.ads [...]
>> EAGAIN      : constant error_code := 11; -- Try again [...]
>> EWOULDBLOCK : constant error_code := 41; -- is now EAGAIN [...]
>> You never know which code the kernel will return.
>
> I don't know a thing about Ada, but if you look at the Linux source:
>   /usr/include/asm/errno.h
> at line 44 on my system you say the equality.

No. This line says, da� 41 (with was returned by older kernels) does not
have a symbolic name anymore. If you recompile an older program, which
assumes the error code 41, it is leaded to 11 with this kernel.

This does not say anything about returning 41.