From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-10 06:51:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.stealth.net news.stealth.net!news.stealth.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1055253080 20642 129.241.83.78 (10 Jun 2003 13:51:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38902 Date: 2003-06-10T13:51:20+00:00 List-Id: Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > kanze@gabi-soft.fr wrote: > >> I'd rather have a language >>in which all of the defaults were fundamentally safe, but with the >>freedom to override them if you had special constraints, or even in >>cases where you came across a case which the language authors hadn't >>considered. I don't know such a language, however; it may exist >>somewhere, but if it does, it certainly isn't very popular or wide >>spread. > > And that's been posted to comp.lang.ada? ;-) Yes. Only goes to show that there are a lot of people who doesn't know that there are better alternatives to C/C++. *sigh* -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/