From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc772,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc772,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-10 09:53:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++.moderated Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: 10 Jun 2003 12:55:45 -0400 Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Sender: cppmods@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Submission-Address: c++-submit@netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.lang.c++.moderated iQBVAwUAPuYNjkHMCo9UcraBAQHlUwH+PcuLgeGY0Ko/Tk1eXL7vMrlcr2oStWxD o/Uv5HXA/WJT/K1ApDqHkwMeTPIGDfF6KYSzBFqM2Zyqvl6b1rI71w== =2pqp Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38912 comp.lang.c++.moderated:68104 Date: 2003-06-10T12:55:45-04:00 List-Id: kanze@gabi-soft.fr wrote: > On the other hand, C++ gives the programmer an enormous freedom. > Including the freedom to write very safe programs. I know of some other > languages which make a lot of claims because one or two elements have a > safer default (array accesses always bounds checked, for example), but > which don't allow you any way of added to the safety built into the > language. ? -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ [ Send an empty e-mail to c++-help@netlab.cs.rpi.edu for info ] [ about comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: do this! ]