From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 03:21:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4F3FD.A0EF7079@alfred-hilscher.de> <6vWcnTWjF83bD0qjXTWcpA@gbronline.com> <3EDCBDF4.1050900@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1054722071 2785 129.241.83.78 (4 Jun 2003 10:21:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:21:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38582 Date: 2003-06-04T10:21:11+00:00 List-Id: Russ wrote: > But Mr. Duff says that "+=" is just "syntactic sugar" for "Add(A,B)," > and Mr. Eachus says "+=" needs a temporary to preserve A in the case > of a Constraint_Error. So, as far as efficiency is concerned, we're > screwed either way, aren't we? No because "Add(A,B)" wouldn't need a temporary. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/