From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-02 08:46:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail
From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
Message-ID: <slrnbdmsah.123.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com>
 <VjOAa.16051$8g5.257873@news2.e.nsc.no> <3ED41344.7090105@spam.com>
 <3ED46D81.FF62C34F@0.0> <3ED46E07.4340CABC@0.0>
 <3ED4F3FD.A0EF7079@alfred-hilscher.de> <xIeBa.1017346$3D1.597085@sccrnsc01>
 <bebbba07.0305292326.75f5fbef@posting.google.com> <u4r3co12f.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <mdlpnoN$6E7R@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <slrnbdm69r.nt.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <BB011381.2FAE%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de
X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1054568790 21605 217.17.192.37 (2 Jun 2003
 15:46:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38371
Date: 2003-06-02T15:46:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Bill Findlay wrote:
> On 2/6/03 10:30, in article slrnbdm69r.nt.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de, "Lutz
> Donnerhacke" <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote:
>> * Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>>> Alternatively, would a renaming declaration work ?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Not always, unfortunately.
> There are restrictions on the lvalues that can be renamed,
> e.g. objects of anonymous type and some discriminated type components
> (I can't remember the details, but I'm sure someone can 8-).

Oops.

> The 'idem, <>, all' proposal adds real power here.

Yes. <> is my favorite.