From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-02 05:58:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1054558715 20633 129.241.83.78 (2 Jun 2003 12:58:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:58:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38338 Date: 2003-06-02T12:58:35+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: > Sergey Koshcheyev wrote: >> Yes, the switch is fine, but it still doesn't let me name a function >> parameter "At", for example. > > Why shouldn't you? Opps sorry misread what you said. Ok then it is the rules of ACT that prohibits this. But it doesn't matter which case it is. I always write Put_Line New_Line etc.. because to *me* this is more reable, but I don't want to force this on others. Beside if there is a New_Line and a new_line which should I choose? -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/