From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1592759aa83d0d45
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 08:05:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: MI in Ada 200X (was: Suggestion for Ada 200x - Interface
 inheritance)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnbd9k0c.a0q.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <0Pxza.699607$OV.652508@rwcrnsc54>
 <4a4de33a.0305280557.5d5aba37@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1054134310 15984 129.241.83.78 (28 May 2003
 15:05:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37912
Date: 2003-05-28T15:05:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

M�rio Amado Alves wrote:

> Everybody wants class MI. The reasons it was left out of Ada 95 and
> 83, the cons, are weaker than the pros. So every Adaist whishes to see
> it in Ada 200X.

Convince me :-) Seriously what are the pros and cons of MI.

-- 
Preben Randhol                    http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/