From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 11:22:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!feed.news.nacamar.de!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1053541359 16422 129.241.83.78 (21 May 2003 18:22:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:22:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37608 Date: 2003-05-21T18:22:39+00:00 List-Id: David C. Hoos wrote: > Well with a decent IDE -- e.g., GNAT with emacs and ada-mode, just > click on the identifier, and go to the subprogram spec. Sure, but try this on printed paper :-) -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/