From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 11:03:37 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnbcnfrg.aap.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com>
 <vcn7svfjbannd6@corp.supernews.com>
 <slrnbcnanb.996.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bagb4p$smg8s$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1053540217 15844 129.241.83.78 (21 May 2003
 18:03:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37604
Date: 2003-05-21T18:03:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> 
> Well, although I'm quite used to that kind of syntax, I personally
> don't like that idea very much. The main reason is that it might be
> confusing to see both sorts of syntaxes in a single source file one
> day...

And it reduces readability IMHO. with My_Windows_Package.A_Window_Method
you know where to find the procedure.
-- 
Preben Randhol                    http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/