From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-17 11:08:58 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Quality systems (Was: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada
 mandate, and why it collapsed and died))
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnbcculn.t7.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com>
 <b9gko2$pub@library1.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305091549.48b9c5d9@posting.google.com>
 <dstanbro-DDA263.20492210052003@mec2.bigpond.net.au>
 <ZpGva.13$1Q1.6@read3.inet.fi>
 <7507f79d.0305121629.5b8b7369@posting.google.com>
 <ln0wa.54$a03.44@read3.inet.fi>
 <9fa75d42.0305130643.526f61c2@posting.google.com>
 <nNmdnZ46ROWIwFyjXTWcqg@gbronline.com>
 <9fa75d42.0305140436.534f7151@posting.google.com>
 <ba067m$iph$1@south.jnrs.ja.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305160440.7846d18c@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbca29h.gve.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <GMrxa.13181$8g5.205254@news2.e.nsc.no>
 <slrnbccqiq.rve.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3ec67910$1@nntp0.pdx.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1053194937 27777 129.241.83.78 (17 May 2003
 18:08:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37456
Date: 2003-05-17T18:08:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

WinGuru wrote:
> In how much time under what conditions with what type or quality of hardware
> and with what type of drivers?  Have you made any particular analysis of why
> there was the crash or did you just blame MS without any real clue as to
> what went wrong?  Seriously, do you have the post-mortem analysis?   Are you
> absolutely positive that you can ascribe the error to Windows and MS and not
> some flaky hardware or device driver?

No, no flaky hardware and all M$ device drivers signed and all. Linux
has not crashed or complained once so it is a M$ Windows problem.

-- 
Preben Randhol                    http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/