From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,899fc98b2883af4a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-16 06:44:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Quality systems (Was: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada
 mandate, and why it collapsed and died))
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnbc9qqo.8e2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com>
 <b9gko2$pub@library1.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305091549.48b9c5d9@posting.google.com>
 <dstanbro-DDA263.20492210052003@mec2.bigpond.net.au>
 <ZpGva.13$1Q1.6@read3.inet.fi>
 <7507f79d.0305121629.5b8b7369@posting.google.com>
 <ln0wa.54$a03.44@read3.inet.fi>
 <9fa75d42.0305130543.60381450@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbc1tum.62g.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <b9tcov$u6q$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305160453.29c0c4af@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1053092696 10614 129.241.83.78 (16 May 2003
 13:44:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63907 comp.object:63539
 comp.lang.ada:37386 misc.misc:14223 comp.software-eng:19228
Date: 2003-05-16T13:44:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

soft-eng wrote:
> The point I have been trying to make is that Ada catches
> a small extra subset of errors (and compared to modern C, C++
> or Java, the "extra" might be non-existent).  Ada or not,
> you should have a mechanism that catches those errors
> before you ship out the jet engine.

Please go an reeducate yourself, your pointless reitterations over what
you percieve to be the case is getting boring.

-- 
Preben Randhol                    http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/