From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,34b29f7884ececc8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-12 07:31:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada & Scripting Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3EBF8EF9.330D3125@konad.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1052749911 15726 129.241.83.78 (12 May 2003 14:31:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37240 Date: 2003-05-12T14:31:51+00:00 List-Id: Frank Piron wrote: > Preben Randhol schrieb: >> >> kat-Zygfryd wrote: >> > Thanks, but I wanted something user-friendly >> > and if I remember properly Scheme is a descendant >> > of Lisp, which is not user-friendly. >> >> User-friendly or newbie-friendly ? :-) Very hard to tell if something is >> user-friendly or not without defining the user. > > This little debate here seems to be one of the > > (emacs/vim vs. user-friendly editors ), > (linux vs. windows), > (command-line vs. GUI) > > category. Lets create a newsgroup named: > "very.common.disagreements" ( vcd ) > or does anything similar already exist? Hehe. No need one can allways cross post :-) I'm not interested in any debate over the user-friendlyness of scripting languages, but that the OP define the user so it is easier for us to see what may be more friendly. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/