From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca18307c7af3189e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-23 17:41:39 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Code beautifiers Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <871xzsg8zk.fsf@sdbk.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1051144899 3487 129.241.83.78 (24 Apr 2003 00:41:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:41:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36447 Date: 2003-04-24T00:41:39+00:00 List-Id: Jano wrote: > I've toyed with adagide but I'm so dependant on vi-mode that can't go > forward with it (but I knew of its reformatting capacities). > > I presume (as adagide) that emacs reformats as you write? I would be > interested in batch processing... It's for a good bunch of very ugly old > files. If I only had time I would make this for vim. By the way did you try vim with the scripts? -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/