From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b90404e71c953be5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-14 09:21:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Experiences with GPS-IDE Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3E9AA2C7.2BF8389B@konad.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1050337277 8814 129.241.83.78 (14 Apr 2003 16:21:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36136 Date: 2003-04-14T16:21:17+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: > GPS does one thing better; generate graphical representations of > withing trees, calling trees, and other "dependencies". One of these > days, Emacs will do that too :). > > Oh, it also has a better browser for C++ code, but that's a separate > issue :). If you were to compare it to other IDE's how does it measure up? Preben