From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,f297d5b850ee1e61 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-16 03:04:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada2005 clear screen etc. Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <87f5a614.0303011527.4cb09de2@posting.google.com> <3E74000C.2040209@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1047812644 10143 129.241.83.78 (16 Mar 2003 11:04:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:04:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35378 Date: 2003-03-16T11:04:04+00:00 List-Id: Robert I. Eachus wrote: > However there are now some very nice database bindings that don't > require a blinding headache--and that were not available in time for > Ada 95. If someone were to take the GNADE work: > http://gnade.sourceforge.net/doc/gnade.html and propose all or part of > it as part of the new standard, go ahead. Personally, I find the thin > ODBC binding easy enough to use, but I think that a thinker binding > would be more appropriate for adding to the standard. Wouldn't mind this :-) > So what will be added to Ada 0Y? The only real consensus at this > point is that there are some container libraries that should be > considered. Check the Ada Issues database > http://www.ada-auth.org/~acats/ais.html for details. This would at least be very nice to have. What about Unicode? Is Wide_String/Character sufficient for further needs? -- Preben Randhol ------------------- http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�