From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c084d20a2c64bbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-15 23:00:20 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!feed.news.nacamar.de!news.csl-gmbh.net!news1.dtag.de!news.erfurt.igrz.de!drcomp.erfurt.thur.de!not-for-mail
From: Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: UniParser 0.21 - ready, changed
Date: 16 Mar 2003 02:31:28 GMT
Organization: Modern Electronics
Message-ID: <slrnb77og0.aol.adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
References: <E18tghQ-0006ya-00@porton.narod.ru> <uu1e5eued.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
X-Server-Date: 16 Mar 2003 02:31:28 GMT
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35374
Date: 2003-03-16T02:31:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Does that means that all Open Source Free Softwares are "junk code"

I guess a high amount of OSS really is. And judging with the usual
standards for software-quality, a lot of non-Ada-software poorly
fails. Sure Ada-ware might even be rubbish, but not at all, it is
better rubbish, because compilers guarantee more :)

-- 
mail: adi@thur.de  	http://adi.thur.de	PGP: v2-key via keyserver

(W)hy (I)t (N)ever (DO)es (W)hat its (S)upposed to.