From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,50137bb64a119cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-21 02:41:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!news.m-online.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "access constant" discriminant Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <_TO1a.14664$9y2.6601@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3CS1a.55972$2H6.1357@sccrnsc04> <3E4E9248.3E71D984@adaworks.com> <1ec946d1.0302201642.66eb93e5@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1045824082 18636 217.17.192.37 (21 Feb 2003 10:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:41:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34335 Date: 2003-02-21T10:41:22+00:00 List-Id: * Matthew Heaney wrote: > Access discriminants are very powerful. No serious Ada95 program can > be written without them. If there is a serious program without access discriminants, let's call it a Spark program, or trivial, ok?