From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b8965337cd786e8b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-09 03:35:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.erfurt.igrz.de!drcomp.erfurt.thur.de!not-for-mail From: Adrian Knoth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada95 in business (database) software Date: 9 Feb 2003 11:17:48 GMT Organization: Modern Electronics Message-ID: References: <3E45EE04.280EC800@verizon.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: drcomp.erfurt.thur.de X-Server-Date: 9 Feb 2003 11:17:48 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33934 Date: 2003-02-09T11:17:48+00:00 List-Id: Mark Wallace wrote: > Is anyone using Ada95 for database-oriented business applications? Me, but not to that extend you might want to do. > either of the principal commercial compilers (Aonix, GNAT) have a decent > (i.e., better than ODBC) interface to Oracle? Did you take a look at gnade.sf.net? -- mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP: v2-key via keyserver Lieber 'ne Latte in der Hose als ein Brett vorm Kopf.