From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6182a664d144508e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-04 07:13:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!diablo.theplanet.net!news.indigo.ie!feeder.news.heanet.ie!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster) Subject: SPARK or RAVENSCAR (from "Re: www.ada-ru.org") References: <3e3ab8ff$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> Reply-To: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (SunOS) Organization: Dublin City University (DCU) Cache-Post-Path: ns2-ext.dcu.ie!unknown@camac.dcu.ie X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Date: 04 Feb 2003 15:13:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Feb 2003 15:13:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.206.1.1 X-Trace: 1044371610 reader.news.heanet.ie 61614 [::ffff:136.206.1.1]:37052 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33769 Date: 2003-02-04T15:13:30+00:00 List-Id: In article news:3e3ab8ff$1@epflnews.epfl.ch , Rodrigo Garcia wrote in response to a post by Dmitriy Anisimkov: " I have seen that, among the links you have added, you have included the ORK page. As one of the project developers of ORK, I am very proud of it. [..] you can read SPARK (the High-Integrity version of Ada) [..]" Hello Rodrigo. SPARK typically involves more dedication to proofs but Ravenscar is not intended to be low integrity I would think. Do you think that SPARK is typically safer (for space work)?