From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-04 06:50:13 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.esat.net!feeder.news.heanet.ie!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster)
Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea..
References: <1043938782.244443@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <25ji3v8n915cnnnaqpjvm4f7i01a66r9pf@4ax.com>
 <1043949507.331484@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <h1ck3vk2mnbo7r8kddsgdjfapha6lr28va@4ax.com>
 <1044025336.3067@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <h96l3vsrtf76akihqdu61r9edeav442eig@4ax.com>
 <1044033063.693737@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <2b9s3vo3bbnaikqd6d4jpppfflfq2kbgfu@4ax.com>
 <1044278793.419261@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <lats3vchsfmpaqiid539c8l7q0293eelcf@4ax.com>
 <1044291655.564852@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <mevu3v04int4alno6fms6llom6vnhlaq0i@4ax.com>
Reply-To: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org
Message-ID: <slrnb3vkp4.eb3.Colin_Paul_Gloster@camac.dcu.ie>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (SunOS)
Organization: Dublin City University (DCU)
Cache-Post-Path: ns2-ext.dcu.ie!unknown@camac.dcu.ie
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: 04 Feb 2003 14:50:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Feb 2003 14:50:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.206.1.1
X-Trace: 1044370212 reader.news.heanet.ie 61614 [::ffff:136.206.1.1]:37052
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33767
Date: 2003-02-04T14:50:12+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
"On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:00:55 -0500, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
wrote:
[..]  
>In Ada, because of lack of MI, it wouldn't work at all.

MI is nice to have, but it would not solve this. Operation disallowing
could. However in most cases, one need just a careful software design
instead of usual quick'n'dirty, which would be better to call "no more
quick, but still dirty".

Or 'not quicker but dirtier'. (: