From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0a15c81dbb968cc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-18 03:17:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: "Eric G. Miller" Subject: Re: Best option for portable GUI? References: <3E284969.85FF8394@easystreet.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:17:58 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.119.6.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 1042888678 216.119.6.1 (Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:17:58 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:17:58 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33170 Date: 2003-01-18T11:17:58+00:00 List-Id: In article <3E284969.85FF8394@easystreet.com>, achrist@easystreet.com wrote: > "Robert C. Leif" wrote: >> >> This is now becoming feasible. The next portable GUI should employ XForms. >> For Windows this can be downloaded from http://www.formsplayer.com/ > > The site says that the client uses the web browser. This is ok, > but it says for Windows use IE 6. > > What other browsers work with XForms? XForms is still just a candidate standard. However, my take is XForms is a a better HTML forms method, but not necessarily rich enough to specify a general GUI. I could be wrong... -- echo ">gra.fcw@2ztr< eryyvZ .T pveR" | rot13 | reverse