From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab66185f2bca0483 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-14 01:35:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.iks-jena.de!not-for-mail From: Lutz Donnerhacke Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extension of non-limited type needs limited component Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: IKS GmbH Jena Message-ID: References: <2dbd76f3.0211130203.7d2d14fd@posting.google.com> <2dbd76f3.0211140133.5ed196fb@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taranis.iks-jena.de X-Trace: branwen.iks-jena.de 1037266525 23153 217.17.192.37 (14 Nov 2002 09:35:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@iks-jena.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:35:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30857 Date: 2002-11-14T09:35:25+00:00 List-Id: * Mike wrote: > Am I allowed to create my own pointer-to-limited type and de-reference > it for use later? Yes. This enshures the locality of the pointer use. That's why it's Ada style to not provide pointers in the base packets. > Wouldn't the act of de-referenceing be an implicit assignment? No.