From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9a5d6b3975624e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-05 01:54:34 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OO in Ada
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 08:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnapta69.1a0.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <mailman.1033697703.29112.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <JVrn9.40015$FO4.9224@sccrnsc03>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1033808073 17483 129.241.83.82 (5 Oct 2002
 08:54:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 08:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29532
Date: 2002-10-05T08:54:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:14:01 GMT, SteveD wrote:

> Although I hear the claim that object.method is more intuitive, I would have
> to say I disagree.  In my opinion the only reason you see it as more
> intuitive is because you learned it that way first (in a different
> programming language).

I agree.

Preben
-- 
Ada95 is good for you.
http://libre.act-europe.fr/Software_Matters/02-C_pitfalls.pdf