From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d39d8ada86dd39d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-27 09:12:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.54.122.107!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT on Mandrake GNU/Linux 9.0 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3d93de6f$1@cpns1.saic.com> <3d93f647@cpns1.saic.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1033143166 25761 129.241.83.82 (27 Sep 2002 16:12:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:12:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29381 Date: 2002-09-27T16:12:46+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:06:21 +0100, Tony Matthews wrote: > Thanks a lot guys. > > GNAT 3.14p it is then. I'll probably go straight for the precompiled > binaries. > > It was reading about the 'unstable' nature of GNAT in GCC 3.2 that caused to > me seek further clarification from this newgroup membership. > > Now, at least, I won't waste any time barking up the wrong tree. > > Do you know if the 3.14p binaries will happily co-exist with Mandrake > GNU/Linux GCC 3.2, or will I have to take some 'precautions' not to > overwrite any important directories/files/libraries etc?? Should work as they have co-existed with gcc 2.95 all this time :-) Preben