From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2081eb53a5f5b6b0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-24 03:14:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Status of GCC-GNAT versus GNAT 3.14-3.15
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnap0eng.1q8.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <slrnaor4g0.2tp.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <TErj9.5424$CM1.27345@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net>
 <g2Ej9.70$8d4.240@news13-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <3d901c56$0$10505$626a54ce@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1032862447 27852 129.241.83.82 (24 Sep 2002
 10:14:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29305
Date: 2002-09-24T10:14:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:05:43 +0200, nicolas wrote:
> 
> If you are willing to build gcc 3.3 on Windows, you'll have to do that

No I'm using Linux. I ask as I see that debian is now building gnat 3.2
in unstable. Gnat 3.14 is in the stable distribution so I'll keep using
this until a gnat 3.x comes that are as stable as gnat 3.14 (or more).

I guess the biggest problem is to get the compiler to work with the
newer gcc backend ?

Preben