From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c019ad9cc913bbe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-19 02:47:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The Dreaded "Missing Subunits"
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnaoj79q.265.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <1b585154.0209121449.ef12609@posting.google.com>
 <x7vu1kss4q2.fsf@pushface.org>
 <4519e058.0209160548.461cef27@posting.google.com>
 <wccptvb9fv1.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <amc64l$4ihi8$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1032428858 26039 129.241.83.82 (19 Sep 2002
 09:47:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29160
Date: 2002-09-19T09:47:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:49:06 +0200, Dmitry A.Kazakov wrote:
> Can somebody explain why those nasty .ads/.adb appeared? Is that a big deal 
> to detect the word "body" in the source code? Why files cannot be just 
> .ada? If I wish to separate specifications and bodies, well, since RSX-11M 
> all operating systems have subfolders...

Come on what is so nasty with .adb .ads? I find it easier to read .ads
files in order to see which functions/procedures the package provides.
If you have a .ada file you will have to jump up and down a lot. Besides
don't you get the with-ing problem with .ada?

Preben