From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52df33ed7828ab9a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-10 21:10:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!nnxp1.twtelecom.net!63.210.96.66.MISMATCH!ps01-chi1!newsfeeds-atl2!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: marc@oscar.eng.cv.net (Marc Spitzer) Subject: Re: Ada OS References: <6dfa3582.0208100016.7a066555@posting.google.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (FreeBSD) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 04:10:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 167.206.9.141 X-Trace: news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net 1029039013 167.206.9.141 (Sun, 11 Aug 2002 00:10:13 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 00:10:13 EDT Organization: Optimum Online Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27924 Date: 2002-08-11T04:10:13+00:00 List-Id: In article , Caffeine Junky wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 04:16:48 -0400, AFS97209 wrote: > >> What about using the current versions of L4 laying around as a starting >> point? > > I was thinking the same thing. What is L4? marc > > I wouldn't be very difficult to get a small OS running on top of L4. Plus > L4 seems to be much more efficient than the Mach microkernel. > > I'm gonna go read up on it some more. > > St4pL3