From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 08:15:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.esat.net!feeder.news.heanet.ie!193.1.198.47.MISMATCH!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster)
Subject: Re: status of Ada STL?
References: <bebbba07.0206132321.23d72ac8@posting.google.com>
 <aedgoc$to7$1@news.iucc.ac.il>
 <bebbba07.0206151051.1c25cf1e@posting.google.com>
 <slrnagu71l.eei.Colin_Paul_Gloster@camac.dcu.ie>
Reply-To: Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org
Message-ID: <slrnah3sc0.6oq.Colin_Paul_Gloster@camac.dcu.ie>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (SunOS)
Organization: Dublin City University (DCU)
Cache-Post-Path: ns2-ext.dcu.ie!unknown@camac.dcu.ie
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: 20 Jun 2002 15:15:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.206.1.1
X-Trace: 1024586112 reader.news.heanet.ie 194 136.206.1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26491
Date: 2002-06-20T15:15:12+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article news:slrnagu71l.eei.Colin_Paul_Gloster@camac.dcu.ie , overly
harsh words such as

"[..] While GNU C++ has (or at least fairly recently had) a reputation for good
conformance to C++ templates, it has (or had) a reputation for one of the least
implemented STL implementations available. [..]"

What I really should have said is that it has a reputation for poor
performance.