From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a43471f113780a14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-09 03:18:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)? Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1023617901 17600 129.241.83.82 (9 Jun 2002 10:18:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:18:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25581 Date: 2002-06-09T10:18:21+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 00:20:06 GMT, Daniel Dudley wrote: > > Yes, Aidan Skinner suggested Emacs too. I've tried it in > connection with both Prolog and Mozart (and maybe others) > but never felt comfortable with it. I guess some people are > more resilient too antiquities than others. ;-) But maybe > Emacs has got better lately, perhaps even got the "look and > feel" of a Windows' program. Now _that_ would be the 8th > wonder of the world! That we should get so lucky. :-) Just for the record Emacs is not an antiquity. Preben