From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,32cfbb718858528b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-04 07:26:09 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Commercial C To Ada 95 compiler
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:26:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnafpjg2.44c.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <dbc393a265e1307a9c6c5e2e9745faf1.86200@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <adgdsn$dup$06$1@news.t-online.com>
 <b94f95abb7f2f260e575a390b132dde2.86200@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <XT3L8.6108$Oj4.4197@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1023200768 22169 129.241.83.82 (4 Jun 2002
 14:26:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:26:08 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25306
Date: 2002-06-04T14:26:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 14:11:03 GMT, Frank J. Lhota wrote:
> I've had some experience with automatic conversion. Yes, a
> well-written converter can get you "acceptable" code in that the
> generated code is 90% likely to compile and reproduce the expected
> behavior.

Does the bugs get reproduced too ;-)

Preben