From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,47bc849aad30d586 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-31 09:50:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A standard package for config files is needed Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3CF5D7AC.975B0DB3@cs.tu-berlin.de> <4519e058.0205310825.868fe4a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1022863850 29132 129.241.83.82 (31 May 2002 16:50:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:50:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25099 Date: 2002-05-31T16:50:50+00:00 List-Id: On 31 May 2002 09:25:18 -0700, Ted Dennison wrote: > > Also realise that for many programs, developing their own tools to > allow users to change the settings would be a real pain. Not every > program is an interactive GUI app. Exactly. Besides even if you make a GUI application you may need to release it before you have had time to make GUI interface to *all* the possible settings. Many of the settings may only be for powerusers so they may as well edit the config file directly. I think earlier versions of GVD worked like this although I'm not 100% sure. > With a text file you can lay all the options out there for the user, > and even add comments to explain *why* the settings were put where > they currently are. You can't easily do that with a program > (particuarly an embeded or real-time app with no user interface). Yes :-) One thing I'm sitting and thinking about now is if it is possible to make a procedure for storing a record or array and reading this back. I mean a generic procedure. Preben