From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-26 02:11:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 09:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0205250258.7502fb36@posting.google.com> <_IQH8.462$II3.79467548@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1022404300 15501 129.241.83.82 (26 May 2002 09:11:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 09:11:40 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24821 Date: 2002-05-26T09:11:40+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 25 May 2002 18:28:10 GMT, tmoran@acm.org wrote: >> As for portability, you are not doing so badly >> if you make something GNAT dependent, > I do think you should use your "Ada Core Technologies" signature when > making a statement with such a clear financial impact. Who should include this signature ? Please look at your newsreader so that quoting gets right. There is no name associated with the text you quoted. Preben