From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbd95a41dd4f1d0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 01:23:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newspeer.monmouth.com!news-feed.ifi.uio.no!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Sockets Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 08:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3ceb5091@news.comindico.com.au> <5ee5b646.0205221834.653e070a@posting.google.com> <83iH8.97025$Po6.204052@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1022315027 2673 129.241.83.82 (25 May 2002 08:23:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 08:23:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24737 Date: 2002-05-25T08:23:47+00:00 List-Id: On 25 May 2002 09:03:16 +0100, Simon Wright wrote: > > I had problems with AdaSockets, I found GNAT.Sockets much easier to > get on with. (Weren't they by the same author?) The difference according to the maintainer of Adasockets is: GNAT.Sockets is officially supported by ACT while AdaSockets is not. GNAT.Sockets will always follow the simplest possible model, while AdaSockets won't. GNAT.Sockets is not object-oriented, AdaSockets is. GNAT.Sockets supports JGNAT, while AdaSockets don't. Preben