From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dcfe2d69587d3122
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-24 14:14:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!blackbush.xlink.net!blackbush.de.kpnqwest.net!news.erfurt.thur.de!drcomp.erfurt.thur.de!not-for-mail
From: Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GtkAda-1.2, Linux
Date: 24 May 2002 20:50:42 GMT
Organization: Modern Electronics
Message-ID: <slrnaet9t2.5gm.adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
References: <slrnaet2o6.54c.adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
 <slrnaet4f1.1kd.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
X-Server-Date: 24 May 2002 20:50:42 GMT
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24690
Date: 2002-05-24T20:50:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote:

>> I'm using GtkAda-2.0, compiled by gcc-3.2. I've replaced all my Gtk-1.2-
>                                        ^^^
>                                        not 3.1 ?

No, I'm using the development-branch, so 3.2 is correct. I'm using it
in order to test the upcoming compilers with usual situations, those
helping to early discover bugs (done with GnuPG which can only be
compiled by gcc-3.1 (or later) after applying a patch I wrote).


-- 
mail: adi@thur.de  	http://adi.thur.de	PGP: v2-key via keyserver

Where you didn't want to go yesterday?