From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 05:31:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Compilers Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3CE39722.60208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1021552306 5515 129.241.83.82 (16 May 2002 12:31:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:31:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24181 Date: 2002-05-16T12:31:46+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 16 May 2002 13:25:22 +0200, David Rasmussen wrote: > Preben Randhol wrote: >> >> What do you mean how good is code generation? >> > > I mean how good is the generated machine code on various CPU's (x86 for > instance) with typical Ada compilers as compared with typical C++ compilers? > Why? The important question is how good is the quality of the software produced with Ada compared to C++. Preben