From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 03:27:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Compilers Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3CE2C8FD.CDD0E75B@nbi.dk> <3ce2e29f.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1021544845 806 129.241.83.82 (16 May 2002 10:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:27:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24169 Date: 2002-05-16T10:27:25+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 16 May 2002 00:35:35 +0200, Kai Schuelke wrote: > could you please explain whats the difference to the Aonix compiler? Or > which annexes the other compilers didn't implement? I am just a beginner but > my first impression was that Aonix produced more "reliable" results. But ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Why do you think that? > thats just a feeling. Preben