From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84bf0ec36cf20893
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-14 09:45:58 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.25.134.62!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-peer.gradwell.net!easynet-melon!easynet.net!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea?
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology
Message-ID: <slrnae2fp6.9oe.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
References: <mr41eu4klae9knk5978o0ru89i5vjc6u2e@4ax.com>
 <5ee5b646.0205140618.2d789fc9@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1021394757 13364 129.241.83.78 (14 May 2002
 16:45:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24035
Date: 2002-05-14T16:45:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 14 May 2002 07:18:38 -0700, Robert Dewar wrote:
> At ACT we use (full) Ada as a scripting language all the time. The
> advantages of strong typing etc apply perfectly well in this environment
> as well. Our only problems with scripts are the old ones written in junk
> untyped languages like shell scripts :-)

See => http://www.vaxxine.com/pegasoft/bush-down.html

Preben