From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,84bf0ec36cf20893 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-14 02:03:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!news-feed.ifi.uio.no!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea? Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 09:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1021367033 26800 129.241.83.78 (14 May 2002 09:03:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 09:03:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24001 Date: 2002-05-14T09:03:53+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 14 May 2002 04:51:51 GMT, James Ross wrote: > > If someone where to create a type-less and interpreted variant of the > Ada language, that for all practical purposes was Ada syntax / rules > without the strong typing -- would that be a useful or worthwhile > thing to do? Or would it be just obfuscating what Ada is all about? BUSH ? http://www.vaxxine.com/pegasoft/bush-down.html