From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7a9613bbc2bd8c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-11 05:23:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail From: Preben Randhol Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Generic default parameters Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 12:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology Message-ID: References: <3CDC19C9.4050003@mail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1021119822 25429 129.241.83.82 (11 May 2002 12:23:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 12:23:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23889 Date: 2002-05-11T12:23:42+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 10 May 2002 15:04:41 -0400, Hyman Rosen wrote: > Preben Randhol wrote: >> I actually like that Ada95 doesn't allow a default value, and I don't >> understand what the gain is in a default value. > > Ada allows default values in other contexts. Default values yes, but arn't you talking about default types? Preben